Current:Home > FinanceJudge rejects Trump’s First Amendment challenge to indictment in Georgia election case -TradeCircle
Judge rejects Trump’s First Amendment challenge to indictment in Georgia election case
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:14:16
ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others rejected on Thursday arguments by the former president that the indictment seeks to criminalize political speech protected by the First Amendment.
The indictment issued in August by a Fulton County grand jury accused Trump and 18 others of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia after the Republican incumbent narrowly lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s attorneys argued that all the charges against him involved political speech that is protected even if the speech ends up being false.
But Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote that at this pretrial stage he must consider the language of the indictment in a light favorable to the prosecution. The charges do not suggest that Trump and the others are being prosecuted simply for making false statements but rather that they acted willfully and knowingly to harm the government, he wrote.
“Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity,” the judge wrote.
He added that even lawful acts involving speech protected by the First Amendment can be used to support a charge under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, which prosecutors used in this case.
But McAfee did leave open the possibility that Trump and others could raise similar arguments “at the appropriate time after the establishment of a factual record.”
Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, said in an email that Trump and the other defendants “respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee’s order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges.” He called it significant that McAfee made it clear they could raise their challenges again later.
A spokesperson for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis declined to comment.
McAfee’s order echoes an earlier ruling in the federal election interference case against Trump brought by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in December that “it is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime.”
McAfee also rejected arguments from Trump co-defendant and former Georgia Republican Party chairman David Shafer challenging certain charges and asking that certain phrases be struck from the indictment. Most of the charges against Shafer have to do with his involvement in the casting of Electoral College votes for Trump by a group of Georgia Republicans even though the state’s election had been certified in favor of Biden.
His lawyers argue that the following phrases are used to assert that the Democratic slate of electors was valid and the Republican slate was not: “duly elected and qualified presidential electors,” “false Electoral College votes” and “lawful electoral votes.” The lawyers said those are “prejudicial legal conclusions” about issues that should be decided by the judge or by the jury at trial.
McAfee wrote that “the challenged language is not prejudicial because it accurately describes the alleged offenses and makes the charges more easily understood by providing a basis to differentiate the allegedly lawful and unlawful acts of presidential electors (as theorized by the State.)” He noted that jurors are repeatedly instructed that an indictment should not be considered evidence.
No trial date has been set for the sprawling Georgia case, one of four criminal cases pending against Trump as he seeks to return to the White House, though Willis has asked for the trial to begin in August. Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others who remain have pleaded not guilty.
veryGood! (45422)
Related
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- All the Candid 2024 Oscars Moments You Missed on TV
- Eva Mendes Has an Iconic Reaction to Ryan Gosling's I'm Just Ken Oscars Performance
- Monica Sementilli says she did not help plan the murder of her L.A. beauty exec husband. Will a jury believe her?
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Monica Sementilli says she did not help plan the murder of her L.A. beauty exec husband. Will a jury believe her?
- Why Christina Applegate Is “Kind of in Hell” Amid Battle With Multiple Sclerosis
- Sophia Bush and Ashlyn Harris Make Debut as a Couple at Elton John's 2024 Oscars Party
- Small twin
- Are grocery stores open Easter 2024? See details for Costco, Kroger, Aldi, Whole Foods, more
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Alexis Bledel Makes Rare Red Carpet Appearance at Elton John AIDS Foundation's Oscars 2024 Party
- The Relatable Reason Jamie Lee Curtis Left the 2024 Oscars Ceremony Mid-Show
- Luke Burbank on taking spring ahead to the next level
- Average rate on 30
- All the Candid 2024 Oscars Moments You Missed on TV
- Best dressed at the Oscars 2024: Lupita Nyong'o, America Ferrera, Zendaya, more dazzling fashion looks
- 2024 relief pitcher rankings: Stable closers are back in vogue
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Vanessa Hudgens reveals baby bump on Oscars red carpet
Georgia readies to resume executions after a 4-year pause brought by COVID and a legal agreement
2 women who bought fatal dose of fentanyl in Mexico for friend sentenced to probation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Oppenheimer Wins Best Picture at Oscars 2024
Breaking glass ceilings: the women seizing opportunities in automotive engineering
List of winners so far at the 2024 Oscars