Current:Home > MarketsRekubit-Supersonic Aviation Program Could Cause ‘Climate Debacle,’ Environmentalists Warn -TradeCircle
Rekubit-Supersonic Aviation Program Could Cause ‘Climate Debacle,’ Environmentalists Warn
Will Sage Astor View
Date:2025-04-08 12:13:23
An experimental jet that aerospace company Lockheed Martin is Rekubitbuilding for NASA as part of a half-billion dollar supersonic aviation program is a “climate debacle,” according to an environmental group that is calling for the space agency to conduct an independent analysis of the jet’s climate impact.
The Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), an environmental advocacy organization based in Silver Spring, Maryland, said supersonic aviation could make the aviation industry’s goal of carbon neutrality unobtainable. In a letter sent to NASA Administrator Bill Nelson on Thursday, the group called on NASA to conduct a “rigorous, independent, and publicly accessible climate impact analysis” of the test jet.
“Supersonic transport is like putting Humvees in the sky,” PEER’s Pacific director, Jeff Ruch, said. “They’re much more fuel consumptive than regular aircraft.”
NASA commissioned the X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology (QueSST) in an effort to create a “low-boom” supersonic passenger jet that could travel faster than the speed of sound without creating the loud sonic booms that plagued an earlier generation of supersonic jets.
The Concorde, a supersonic passenger plane that last flew in 2003, was limited to speeds below Mach 1, the speed of sound, when flying over inhabited areas to avoid the disturbance of loud sonic booms. The QueSST program seeks to help develop jets that can exceed the speed of sound—approximately 700 miles per hour—without creating loud disturbances.
However, faster planes also have higher emissions. Supersonic jets use 7 to 9 times more fuel per passenger than conventional jets according to a study published last year by the International Council on Clean Transportation.
NASA spokesperson Sasha Ellis said the X-59 jet “is not intended to be used as a tool to conduct research into other challenges of supersonic flight,” such as emissions and fuel burn.
“These challenges are being explored in other NASA research,” Ellis said, adding that NASA will study the environmental effects from the X-59 flights over the next two years.
The emissions of such increased fuel use could, theoretically, be offset by “e-kerosene”—fuel generated from carbon dioxide, water and renewably-sourced electricity—the study’s authors wrote. But the higher cost e-kerosene, coupled with the higher fuel requirements of supersonic travel, would result in a 25-fold increase in fuel costs for low-carbon supersonic flights relative to the cost of fuel for conventional air travel, the study found.
“Even if they’re able to use low carbon fuels, they’ll distort the market and make it more difficult for enough of the SAF [Sustainable Aviation Fuel] to go around,” Ruch, who was not part of the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) study, said.
The ICCT report concluded that even if costly low-emissions fuels were used for supersonic jets, the high-speed aircraft would still be worse for the climate and could also harm the Earth’s protective ozone layer. This is because supersonic jets release high volumes of other pollutants such as nitrous oxide at higher elevations, where they do more harm to the climate and to atmospheric ozone than conventional jets.
In their letter to Administrator Nelson, PEER also expressed concerns about NASA’s Urban Air Mobility program, which the environmental group said would “fill city skies with delivery drones and air-taxis” in an effort to reduce congestion but would also require more energy, and be more expensive, than ground-based transportation.
“It’s another example of an investment in technology that at least for the foreseeable future, will only be accessible to the ultra rich,” said Ruch.
NASA also has a sustainable aviation program with a stated goal of helping to achieve “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation sector by 2050.” The program includes the X-57, a small experimental plane powered entirely by electricity.
NASA plans to begin test flights of both the supersonic X-59 and the all-electric X-57 sometime this year.
veryGood! (629)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- 'Just a pitching clinic': Jack Flaherty gem vs. Mets has Dodgers sitting pretty in NLCS
- Flash Sale Alert: Save 44% on Apple iPad Bundle—Shop Now Before It’s Gone!
- Sold! What did Sammy Hagar's custom Ferrari LaFerrari sell for at Arizona auction?
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- How The Unkind Raven bookstore gave new life to a Tennessee house built in 1845
- Surfer Bethany Hamilton Shares Update After 3-Year-Old Nephew's Drowning Incident
- When is 'Tracker' back? Season 2 release date, cast, where to watch
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Inside LSU football's wild comeback that will change Brian Kelly's tenure (Or maybe not.)
Ranking
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Concerns for playoff contenders lead college football Week 7 overreactions
- How long does COVID last? Here’s when experts say you'll start to feel better.
- Kylie Jenner and Timothée Chalamet Spotted on Dinner Date in Rare Sighting
- Average rate on 30
- How child care costs became the 'kitchen table issue' for parents this election season
- Opinion: Yom Kippur reminds us life is fleeting. We must honor it with good living.
- When is 'Tracker' back? Season 2 release date, cast, where to watch
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Drake Celebrates Son Adonis' 7th Birthday With Sweet SpongeBob-Themed Photos
Struggling to pay monthly bills? These companies say they can help lower them.
Feel Your Best: Body Care Products to Elevate Your Routine
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
J.Crew Outlet’s Extra 70% off Sale -- $228 Tweed Jacket for $30, Plus $16 Sweaters, $20 Pants & More
Feel Your Best: Body Care Products to Elevate Your Routine
Concerns for playoff contenders lead college football Week 7 overreactions