Current:Home > reviewsCharles Langston:Colorado plans to relocate wolf pack as reintroduction effort stumbles amid livestock attacks -TradeCircle
Charles Langston:Colorado plans to relocate wolf pack as reintroduction effort stumbles amid livestock attacks
TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 18:31:49
Wildlife agencies are Charles Langstontrying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado’s ambitious wolf reintroduction program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the first year of the voter-driven initiative.
The move comes only a week after state officials touted three pups born to the Copper Creek pack, which formed after 10 of the predators were released in December over bitter opposition from livestock groups. The pack has at least two adults.
The bid to capture them goes against the state’s wolf management plan. That 2023 document includes guidance that a relocation “has little technical merit” because it could create problems elsewhere if the animals continue attacking livestock.
Officials did not say where the Copper Creek pack would be relocated.
Ranching groups wanted the wolf pack killed. Wildlife advocates said more should have been done to keep them from killing livestock, such as using electric fencing that can better deters attacks.
In other parts of the U.S. where wolves are well-established — including in the Northern U.S. Rocky Mountains and around the Great Lakes — the predators are routinely killed by wildlife officials in response to livestock attacks. Wolves are prolific breeders so removing some animals doesn’t have population-wide effects.
Colorado’s attempt to instead capture problem wolves comes after an agency spokesperson told The Associated Press last week that officials wanted to avoid killing them because “it’s too early in the process” of reintroduction.
“We don’t have enough wolves on the landscape to lethally remove” the pack, spokesperson Travis Duncan said.
State officials did not disclose where the capture operations were taking place but said the work was being done in conjunction with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Michael Saul with Defenders of Wildlife said it was a “big setback” for the reintroduction.
“There are lots of ranchers using existing tools who are living with wolves and not having this problem,” Saul said.
In a statement issued late Tuesday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis characterized the Copper Creek pack relocation as a “unique case,” but did not elaborate.
“This action is by no means a precedent for how CPW will resolve wolf-livestock conflict moving forward,” Davis said in the statement. “The ultimate goal of the operation is to relocate the pack to another location while we assess our best options for them to continue to contribute to the successful restoration of wolves in Colorado.”
Wolf reintroduction in Colorado was narrowly approved by voters in a 2020 ballot measure. Wildlife officials expect to release an additional 30 to 50 wolves over the coming years. A handful of wolves have also wandered into Colorado from Wyoming.
Proponents argued that the apex predators would reestablish an ecological balance in the area. Wolves were largely hunted out of the state by the 1940s.
Owners of calves that are killed can be compensated by the state for the animal’s market value, up to $15,000. Ranchers have said that’s not enough.
Gray wolves killed some 800 domesticated animals across 10 states in 2022, including Colorado, according to a previous Associated Press review of depredation data from state and federal agencies. While the losses can affect individual ranchers, it has a negligible effect on the industry at large.
veryGood! (271)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Kim Zolciak Requests Kroy Biermann Be Drug Tested Amid Divorce Battle
- Dakota Pipeline Is Ready for Oil, Without Spill Response Plan for Standing Rock
- This week on Sunday Morning (June 18)
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Fearing More Pipeline Spills, 114 Groups Demand Halt to Ohio Gas Project
- Clinics on wheels bring doctors and dentists to health care deserts
- How to watch a rare 5-planet alignment this weekend
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- 'Are you a model?': Crickets are so hot right now
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Carbon Footprint of Canada’s Oil Sands Is Larger Than Thought
- North Dakota Supreme Court ruling keeps the state's abortion ban on hold for now
- Standing Rock’s Pipeline Fight Brought Hope, Then More Misery
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Amid Doubts, Turkey Powers Ahead with Hydrogen Technologies
- Ethical concerns temper optimism about gene-editing for human diseases
- Is Teresa Giudice Leaving Real Housewives of New Jersey Over Melissa Gorga Drama? She Says...
Recommendation
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
In Congress, Corn Ethanol Subsidies Lose More Ground Amid Debt Turmoil
Ravaged by Drought, a Honduran Village Faces a Choice: Pray for Rain or Migrate
What is Babesiosis? A rare tick-borne disease is on the rise in the Northeast
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Walgreens won't sell abortion pills in red states that threatened legal action
Australian airline rolls out communal lounge for long-haul flights
Uh-oh. A new tropical mosquito has come to Florida. The buzz it's creating isn't good