Current:Home > MyAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -TradeCircle
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-13 11:36:56
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (443)
Related
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- You Only Have 24 Hours To Save 25% On These Comfy Clarks Loafers, Which Are the Perfect Fall Shoes
- Chairperson of Alabama’s medical marijuana commission steps down
- Keith Urban, Kix Brooks, more to be inducted into Nashville Songwriters Hall of Fame
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Actor Mark Margolis, murderous drug kingpin on ‘Breaking Bad’ and ‘Better Call Saul,’ dies at 83
- Proof Dream Kardashian and Tatum Thompson Already Have a Close Bond Like Rob and Khloe Kardashian
- Bachelor Nation's Amanda Stanton Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Husband Michael Fogel
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Cleanup from chemical spill and fire that shut down I-24 in Tennessee could take days
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Stock market today: Asian stocks mixed ahead of US jobs update following British rate hike
- Tim McGraw Reveals His Daughters Only Want to Sing With Mom Faith Hill
- Taylor Swift's remaining surprise songs: What you still might hear on the Eras Tour
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- North Dakota lawmakers eye Minnesota free tuition program that threatens enrollment
- Proof Lili Reinhart and Her Cowboy Boyfriend Jack Martin Are Riding Off Into the Sunset
- James Barnes, Florida man who dropped appeals, executed for 1988 hammer killing of nurse
Recommendation
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Remote work and long weekends help boost local economies
A teen was caught going 132 mph on a Florida interstate. The deputy then called his father to come get him.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles return, rebooted and reinvigorated, for 'Mutant Mayhem'
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
Celebrate National Underwear Day With an Aerie 10 Panties for $35 Deal Instead of Paying $90
‘Back to the Future’ review: Broadway musical is a dazzling joyride stuck on cruise control
Fifth Gilgo Beach victim identified as Karen Vergata, police say