Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -TradeCircle
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-11 12:18:55
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Mung bean omelet, anyone? Sky high egg prices crack open market for alternatives
- Why higher winter temperatures are affecting the logging industry
- Too Much Sun Degrades Coatings That Keep Pipes From Corroding, Risking Leaks, Spills and Explosions
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Biden Has Promised to Kill the Keystone XL Pipeline. Activists Hope He’ll Nix Dakota Access, Too
- Inside Clean Energy: A California Utility Announces 770 Megawatts of Battery Storage. That’s a Lot.
- Migrant crossings along U.S.-Mexico border plummeted in June amid stricter asylum rules
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Rihanna Has Love on the Brain After A$AP Rocky Shares New Photos of Their Baby Boy RZA
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Taylor Swift and Gigi Hadid Prove Their Friendship Never Goes Out of Style in NYC
- NPR and 'New York Times' ask judge to unseal documents in Fox defamation case
- Warming Trends: Increasing Heat is Dangerous for Pilgrims, Climate Warnings Painted on Seaweed and Many Plots a Global Forest Make
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Craft beer pioneer Anchor Brewing to close after 127 years
- 8 Simple Hacks to Prevent Chafing
- San Francisco Becomes the Latest City to Ban Natural Gas in New Buildings, Citing Climate Effects
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Can bots discriminate? It's a big question as companies use AI for hiring
The Sweet Way Travis Barker Just Addressed Kourtney Kardashian's Pregnancy
If You're a Very Busy Person, These Time-Saving Items From Amazon Will Make Your Life Easier
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
How the pandemic changed the rules of personal finance
Cosmetic surgeon who streamed procedures on TikTok loses medical license
Bank of America created bogus accounts and double-charged customers, regulators say