Current:Home > reviewsThe spending bill will cut emissions, but marginalized groups feel they were sold out -TradeCircle
The spending bill will cut emissions, but marginalized groups feel they were sold out
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-08 11:11:16
The Inflation Reduction Act signed into law Tuesday by President Biden includes more than $360 billion to address climate change. That's the largest single investment ever made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions — something the White House and major environmental groups are touting as a huge win for humanity.
But not everyone will feel the benefits of the new bill equally, analysts and advocates warn. People living in neighborhoods that are already dealing with a lot of pollution fear they will face more harm and climate risk, not less. And that could deepen existing environmental inequalities and lock in decades of unnecessary illness and suffering for people who are already marginalized.
"There are some parts [of the law] that are good, and there are some parts that are really bad," says Mijin Cha, a professor at Occidental College who studies how to make the transition to a low-carbon economy fairer for workers and communities. "And the parts [of the law] that are really bad are pretty significant."
The law includes hundreds of billions of dollars to tackle global warming by building more solar and wind power, making buildings more energy efficient and helping people buy electric vehicles. Analysts estimate it will help the United States reduce planet-warming emissions by about 40% compared to 2005 levels by the end of the decade, which is a big step toward a truly low-carbon economy.
But in order to get the critical support of conservative Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, the law also invests in fossil fuels. It subsidizes the building of new pipelines, guarantees new leasing of oil and gas drilling, and incentivizes investment in still-nascent carbon capture technology, which would allow existing, heavily polluting fossil fuel facilities to operate longer.
Those fossil fuel investments led dozens of grassroots environmental organizations to reject the bill, arguing that the harms to communities near fossil fuel sites would outweigh the climate benefits. That's especially true for poor people, Indigenous people and Black people who are already more likely to live with more pollution and less access to clean energy.
"We are sitting right now with a lot of contradictions. While [the bill] does designate some funding for disadvantaged communities, it's also subsidizing fossil fuels," says Juan Jhong-Chung, the climate director at the Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition. "It feels like what the bill is giving with one hand, it's taking with the other."
For example, Jhong-Chung says the new law could pay for air monitoring in Southwest Detroit, where he lives and where industrial air pollution makes people sick. But at the same time, the law invests in the fossil fuel industry, which could help those industrial facilities operate for decades to come.
"It feels like we're being sacrificed, like we're being left behind,"Jhong-Chung says . "It doesn't feel good that this is the best we can get."
The Biden administration disputes the idea that the law doesn't do enough for marginalized communities. "This is a direct investment in helping clean up communities that have been left out and left behind," says Ali Zaidi, the deputy national climate advisor to President Biden.
The White House estimates that the law includes over $60 billion in spending on so-called environmental justice. That includes money to reduce emissions around U.S. ports, plant trees in city neighborhoods that are hotter because of past racist housing policies, make electric vehicles more affordable and install solar panels and make buildings more efficient in low-income neighborhoods.
A separate analysis estimates the law contains significantly less — closer to $45 billion — in direct spending toward environmental justice.
Zaidi acknowledges the law is not perfect, but says it's an "unprecedented amount of investment" that will bring broad benefits to Americans.
"This bill is the product of compromise," he says, referring to the drawn-out Congressional negotiations that finally led to the bill's passage. "Without compromise there would be no bill."
That rhetoric is frustrating for those who feel like they are on the losing end of the compromise. "I think it's really hurtful for people [who live] where you have a lot of poverty, where you have a lot of dirty energy," says Kendall Dix, the national policy director for Taproot Earth, a climate justice organization based in Louisiana. He fears the new law will lead to more pollution along the Gulf Coast, where petrochemical facilities are concentrated, and air pollution already causes widespread illness and premature death.
"Are we going to be fine with some communities being written off?" Dix says. "And which communities?"
Cha, of Occidental University, says there's a long history of concentrating pollution in places where poor people or people of color live, in the name of overall economic and technological progress. "We have this idea of sacrifice zones, which is that there are just areas of the country that just have so much pollution, we're just sacrificing those communities," she explains. "That will continue in this bill."
veryGood! (96925)
Related
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- 'Bottoms' is an absurdist high school sex comedy that rages and soars
- Minneapolis mayor vetoes measure for minimum wage to Uber and Lyft drivers
- Windows are shattered in a Moscow suburb as Russia says it thwarts latest Ukraine drone attack
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Drew Barrymore Audience Member Recounts “Distraught” Reaction to Man’s Interruption
- How the 2024 presidential candidates talk about taxes and budget challenges — a voters' guide
- Man drowns trying to rescue wife, her son in fast-moving New Hampshire river
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Selena Gomez Reacts to AI Version of Herself Singing Ex The Weeknd’s Song “Starboy”
Ranking
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Pakistani rescuers try to free 6 kids and 2 men in a cable car dangling hundreds of feet in the air
- Death Valley, known for heat and drought, got about a year's worth of rain in a day from Hilary
- Spotless arrival: Rare giraffe without coat pattern is born at Tennessee zoo
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- In the 1930s, bank robberies were a craze. This one out of Cincinnati may take the cake.
- Why we don't trust the 'vanilla girl'
- Minneapolis mayor vetoes measure for minimum wage to Uber and Lyft drivers
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Arrest made in death of 1-year-old girl left in hot van outside of Nebraska day care
Wisconsin Republicans grill judicial commissioners with a focus on high court’s new liberal majority
Scary landing as jet’s wheel collapses on touchdown in California during Tropical Storm Hilary
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
UW System to ask lawmakers for part of $32 million GOP withheld to end diversity efforts in October
A judge will consider if Texas can keep its floating barrier to block migrants crossing from Mexico
Lauryn Hill announces 25th anniversary tour of debut solo album, Fugees to co-headline